论文部分内容阅读
改革开放以来,中国与其他国家的交流日益增加,外国人到中国居住、生活的现象十分普遍。南京卡尔案的发生固然有其个案因素,更深层次的原因在于中西方关于个人住宅保护观念的差异。历史与国度差异中国历史上不重视私有财产和个人隐私保护。在奴隶社会,奴隶根本没有财产和隐私可言,奴隶主可以随便闯入奴隶家中,抢走奴隶的一切,甚至妻子、儿女。在中国漫长的封建社会,各级官吏及其助手不仅可以随意进入百姓家中,统治者甚至通过推行保甲制度、连坐制度要求和鼓励百姓之间随时到
Since the reform and opening up, the exchange between China and other countries has been on the increase. It is very common for foreigners to live and live in China. Although the occurrence of the Nanjing Carl case has its own case factors, the deeper reason lies in the differences between the concept of personal housing protection in China and the West. Differences between history and country China’s history does not attach importance to private property and personal privacy protection. In slave society, slaves have no property and no privacy at all. Slave owners can easily break into slavery homes, take away everything from slaves, and even wives and children. In China’s long feudal society, officials at all levels and their aides not only have free access to the homes of ordinary people, but the rulers, even through the implementation of the Baojia system, can even sit down with the system and encourage people