论文部分内容阅读
网络经济有别于传统经济形态,网络外部性、高固定成本和低边际成本、虚拟化以及扁平化的特点使得在传统经济规律中大放光彩的反垄断法律体系在面对网络经济下滥用市场支配地位行为时难以合理规制。2014年,最高人民法院对“奇虎360公司与腾讯公司滥用市场支配地位纠纷一案”的上诉案判决为解决此类问题提供了思路,象征着国家已经开始正视网络经济下的新挑战。传统反垄断体系仍然在这一片新领域中起着重要作用,但为了更好应对挑战,弱化传统反垄断法中对于相关市场的界定方法,综合评估该行为对消费者和竞争造成的消极效果和可能具有的积极效果,或许更能体现反垄断初衷。
Unlike the traditional economic patterns, the network economy is characterized by the network externalities, high fixed costs and low marginal costs. The virtualization and flattening of the network economy make the antitrust legal system, which is shined in the traditional economic laws, abuse the market in the networked economy Difficult to rationally regulate dominance. In 2014, the Supreme People’s Court’s appeal on the case of dispute over the misuse of market dominance by Qihoo 360 and Tencent Company provided a solution to such problems, symbolizing that the country has begun to face up to new challenges under the network economy . The traditional antitrust system still plays an important role in this new field. However, in order to better meet the challenges and weaken the definition of the relevant market in the traditional antitrust laws, the comprehensive evaluation of the negative effects of such acts on consumers and competition and The positive effect that may have may perhaps reflect the original intention of antitrust.