论文部分内容阅读
杨廷和在纂修《明武宗实录》期间的一些修史举措及影响一直未被学界予以较多关注。其在史料择取、力倡节俭、厘正曲笔、人员选拔等方面颇有贡献。嗣后,“大礼议”兴起,随着杨廷和的去职,史馆中与其持相近立场的修史人员多遭贬谪而未能出现在最终修纂人员名录中。总体而言,杨氏为修史工作提供支持的同时,亦卷入了任意增减史材及人物评价失实之訾议。
Yang Tinghe and his compilation of “Ming Wusong factual record” during the history of some initiatives and the impact has not been academia pay more attention. It makes a great contribution to the selection of historical materials, the promotion of frugality, the correctional writing and the selection of personnel. Subsequently, with the rise of Yang T’ing-hwa and the removal of Yang Ting-hwa, many of the historians in the History Museum, many of whom were close positions, were mostly deprived of the title and could not appear in the final list of compilers. On the whole, while Young supports the work of repairing history, he also has been involved in any proposal to increase or decrease the historical facts and figures.