论文部分内容阅读
《公羊疏》引《尚书》注解以郑玄注为主,并未引述伪《孔传》。《公羊疏》所引之《孝经》旧疏,具有宗郑玄注,据谶纬立说之特点。《公羊疏》多引述北朝《公羊》旧疏,是《公羊》学一度“大行于河北”的反映。综合上述三个方面考察,《公羊疏》反映了北朝经学尊崇汉学之学风,其成书上限不早于北魏后期宣武、孝明帝之际(公元510年前后),下限不晚于北齐末、隋初(公元580年前后),很可能为东魏、北齐间燕赵之地的经生所撰。
“Rams sparse” cited “Shangshu” notes to Zheng Xuan note-based, did not quote the pseudo “Kong Chuan.” “Kalachakra” cited by the “Book of Filial Piety” old sparse, with Zheng Zheng Xuan injection, according to Wei latitude characteristics. “Rams sparse” quoted more than the Northern Dynasty, “Rams” old sparse, is “Rams” once learned “big line in Hebei ” reflection. Based on the investigation of the above three aspects, “Kalachakra” reflects the Northern Song Dynasty Confucian classics respected sinology style of study, its book limit not earlier than the late Northern Wei Dynasty Xuanwu, Emperor Ming Emperor (around 510 AD), the lower limit of the Northern Qi Dynasty, Sui At the beginning (around 580 AD), it is likely to be written by the students of the Eastern Hebei and Northern Qi dynasties.