论文部分内容阅读
本文讨论《礼记》经注诸版本间之关系及其价值,认为现存版本可分两系统,一为《唐石经》———宋监本系统,抚州本、八行注疏本属焉;余仁仲本、纂图互注本及十行注疏本、闽、监、毛本属另一系统。清代校勘《礼记》的两部代表性著作《礼记注疏校勘记》、《抚本礼记考异》都未见到余仁仲本及纂图互注本,因而未能辨识十行本众多讹误的由来。今校余仁仲本,知十行本经注文本的底本是余仁仲本或类似余仁仲本的别本,十行本与抚本、八行本之间没有直接的继承关系。至于岳本,应视为这两种系统的混成品,实不足珍重。这种认识也推翻了十行本在经注、疏汇刻本的基础上附入《释文》而成的通俗概念。
This article discusses the relationship and value of the Book of Rites through various editions, and holds that the existing version can be divided into two systems, one is “Tang Shi Jing” --- Song Jian Ben system, Fuzhou Ben, Zhongben, compilation of each note and ten lines Note Note, Fujian, supervision, hair belongs to another system. The two representative works of the Book of Rites in the Qing Dynasty, such as “Book of Rites Annotation” and “Book of Rites Examination” failed to recognize the ten books The origin of many corruption. This school Yu Renzhong Ben, the book of 10 copies of the Notes by the text of the second chapter is similar to Yu Renzhong or other books, the ten lines and Fu Ben, the eight lines between the direct inheritance. As for Yue Ben, should be regarded as a mixture of these two systems, it is not enough treasure. This kind of understanding also overturned the popular concept that ten lines were attached to the “interpretation texts” on the basis of the notes and the translations.