论文部分内容阅读
根据刘家和先生的观点,自殷、周之际至司马迁作《史记》的这段时间是中国古典史学的形成时期。这一时期又可分为“以史为鉴”、“以史为法”和“以史立言”这样三个阶段,分别以《尚书》、《春秋》和《史记》为代表。本文目的在于,根据刘先生的这一分期框架,分析和探究中国古典史学中的“求真”问题,然后在与西方有关历史客观性理论的比较视野下,挖掘其对当前有关历史客观性或真实性观念的重建所可能具有的意义和价值。
According to Mr. Liu Jiahe’s point of view, the period from the time of Yin and Zhou to that of Sima Qian as “Historical Records” is the formation period of Chinese classical history. This period can be divided into three stages: “learning from history”, “taking history as method” and “using history as reference”, respectively represented by Shangshu, Chunqiu and Shi Ji. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and explore the issue of “truth ” in Chinese classical historiography according to this staging frame of Mr. Liu. Then, under the comparative perspective of Western theory of historical objectivity, The possible significance and value of the reconstruction of the concept of sexuality or authenticity.