论文部分内容阅读
近些年,交通肇事罪共犯问题在刑法界一直都是讨论的热点话题。但是,我国现行刑法共犯理论并不认可交通肇事罪中存在共同过失犯罪,但最高人民法院司法解释的规定却背道而驰。最高院颁布的《解释》第五条第二款之规定,将指使逃逸行为人以交通肇事罪共犯论处是不合理的,这一规定与我国现行的共同犯罪理论是矛盾的。通过一系列的分析,指使交通肇事者逃逸的行为,不能以交通肇事罪共犯论处。本文根据罪刑法定原则与主客观相一致原理,依照刑法关于交通肇事罪的规定,寻求解决司法解释与刑法规定相冲突的最佳路径。
In recent years, the issue of complicity in crimes of traffic accident has always been a hot topic of discussion in the criminal law community. However, the existing theory of criminal offense in our country does not recognize the crime of common negligence in the crime of traffic accident, but the provisions of the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court runs in the opposite direction. The Supreme Court promulgated the “Interpretation,” the second paragraph of the provisions of the provisions of the escape behavior will be instructed to convict the crime of traffic accident offense is unreasonable, this provision and our current common crime theory is contradictory. Through a series of analyzes, the act of committing perpetrators of traffic perpetrators can not be dealt with by accomplices in the traffic accident. In accordance with the principle of legality and principle of subjectivity and subjectivity, this article seeks to resolve the best way of conflict between judicial interpretation and the provisions of criminal law in accordance with the criminal law provisions on traffic accident crime.