论文部分内容阅读
目的：研究竹叶青咬伤患者绷扎与非绷扎的临床治疗疗效及相关并发症,为临床毒蛇咬伤的紧急处理方式提供一定理论依据。方法回顾性分析2012年2月~2015年2月间于我院就诊的50例竹叶青咬伤患者,按照伤后是否进行伤口绷扎将其分为两组,绷扎组21例,非绷扎组29例。比较两组患者肿痛消失时间、伤口愈合时间、渗出物消失时间、住院时间及伤后感染、坏死情况。结果绷扎组伤口愈合时间为5.89±0.32(d),肿痛消失时间6.13±1.21(d),伤后治疗时间为7.12±1.01(d),非绷扎组伤口愈合时间为6.07±1.16(d),肿痛消失时间6.31±1.13(d),伤后治疗时间为7.21±2.32(d),两组相比,各指标之间均无明显差异,经统计学分析,>0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论竹叶青咬伤院前急救可予患肢冰敷代替近心端绷扎以减轻疼痛并促使血管收缩。“,”Objective Analysis the clinical ef ects of bandage and non-bandage for patients bit en by green bamboo snake provide certain theoretical basis for clinical disease diagnosis and treatment. Methods Research object in February 2013 to our hospital in February 2015,a total of 50 patients bit en by green bamboo snake has been divided into bandaged group (21 cases)and non-bandaged group (19 cases),Compare two groups of patients with sore disappear time,wound healing time,exudation time,hospitalization time and wound infection,necrosis.Results As bandaged group,the wound healing time was 5.89±0.32(d),sore disappear time was 6.13±1.21(d),the treatment time after injury was 7.12±1.01(d),while the non-bandaged,wound healing time was 6.07±1.16(d),sore disappear time was 6.31±1.13 (d),the treatment time after injury was 7.21±2.32 (d),compared two groups,the indicators are no significant dif erences between the statistical analysis, >0.05,there was no statistical y significant dif erence.Conclusion Bamboo pre-hospital emergency bite to limb ice near heart instead of tension to al eviate the pain and causes vasoconstriction.