论文部分内容阅读
目的回顾性分析常规长方案促排卵失败者行微刺激方案促排卵效果。方法回顾性分析本中心2011年1月至2012年9月采用长方案促排卵IVF/ICSI-ET失败后采用微刺激方案促排卵治疗92例,共222周期。比较分析两者在MII卵率、2PN率及优胚率等方面有无差异。结果长方案组获卵数、MII卵数、优胚数、2PN数、卵裂数及卵裂率高于微刺激组,两者有统计学差异;优胚率低于微刺激组,结果有统计学差异(P<0.05);MII卵率及2PN率无统计学差异。结论常规长方案促排卵失败者微刺激方案仍可能获得较好的实验室结果。
Objective To retrospectively analyze the ovulation promoting effect of the micro-stimulation regimen in patients with failure of conventional long-term ovulation induction. Methods A retrospective analysis of the center from January 2011 to September 2012 with long-term program to promote ovulation IVF / ICSI-ET failed to use micro-stimulation program to promote ovulation in 92 cases, a total of 222 cycles. There was no difference in MII egg rate, 2PN rate and excellent embryo rate between the two groups. Results The number of oocytes, the number of MII oocytes, the number of superior embryos, the number of 2PN, the number of cleavages and cleavage rate in the long-term treatment group were higher than those in the micro-stimulation group, and the difference was statistically significant. The excellent embryo rate was lower than that in the micro-stimulation group Statistical difference (P <0.05); MII egg rate and 2PN rate had no statistical difference. Conclusion The conventional long-term program to promote ovulation failure micro-stimulation program may still get better laboratory results.