论文部分内容阅读
上市公司亏损能不能坚决退出市场,关系到要一个健康的证券市场,还是要局部一方的利益和太平?是否保护PT股民的利益? 我们的结论只有一个,中国要一个健康的证券市场！退出是市场行为,重组也是市场行为,但其中有一个大的利益市场和小的利益市场之差,这个差别足以导致中国证券市场完全不同的命运。十多年前，曹思源先生倡导实施企业破产法，呼吁优胜劣汰的机制，阻力重重。阻力来自职工失业，国有资产流失，但最终《破产法》还是实施了。然而，当年破产阻力方的思维定式再度成为今天证券市场退市机制的阻力，直到现在仍然不排除有两种结果:退出和不退出。面对退市机制及系列相关问题，曹思源先生的意见如何?记者来到思源兼并与破产咨询事务所。曹先生直言了他的观点和意见。
Whether the loss of a listed company can be determined to withdraw from the market depends on whether it is a healthy stock market or partial interests and peace? Whether the interests of investors in PT are protected? Only one of our conclusions is that China wants a healthy stock market! Exit is a market behavior, and reorganization is also a market behavior. However, there is a big difference between a big interest market and a small interest market. This difference is enough to lead to completely different destinies in China’s securities market. Ten years ago, Mr. Cao Siyuan advocated the implementation of corporate bankruptcy law, calling for the survival of the fittest mechanism with heavy resistance. The resistance came from the unemployment of workers and the loss of state assets, but eventually the Bankruptcy Law was still implemented. However, the thinking of the bankruptcy resistance side once again became the resistance of the delisting mechanism of the securities market today. Up to now, there are still two kinds of consequences: exit and no exit. In the face of the delisting mechanism and a series of related issues, what is Mr. Cao’s opinion? The reporter came to Siyuan Merger and Bankruptcy Consulting Firm. Mr. Cao bluntly said his views and opinions.