1996年,云南的《大家》杂志在第1期发表北京大学教授戴锦华与批评家王干的对话“女性文学与个人化写作”。这篇对话,戴锦华在收进她个人的集子《犹在镜中——戴锦华访谈录》中标题换为“女性写作脉络与男性视点”。这显然是一篇针尖对麦芒的对话,直至对话结束,女批评家与男批评家也没有达成共识,各说各话。这大概也是戴锦华要改换标题的缘由吧? In 1996, Yunnan’s “Everyone” magazine published in the first issue a dialogue between Peking University professor Dai Jinhua and critic Wang Gan, “Woman’s Literature and Personal Writing.” In this dialogue, Dai Jinhua, in her interview with her personal collection of “Still in the Mirror - An Interview with Dai Jinhua,” was replaced by the title of “Female Writing Context and Male Perspective.” This is obviously a tip-to-horse dialogue, until the end of the dialogue, female critics and male critics have not reached a consensus, each said something. This is probably why Dai Jinhua want to change the title, right?