论文部分内容阅读
改革开放初期,在传统古史分期理论框架下,“西周封建论”、“秦统一封建说”、“魏晋封建论”等学派对郭沫若“战国封建论”陆续提出新的质疑、商榷与批判,“战国封建论”学者则在对来自以上各派种种辩难予以回击反驳的同时,也对郭沫若“战国封建论”进行了补充、订正。以上论辩对新时期中国古代社会形态与古史分期的研究起到了一定的拓展与深化作用。改革开放初期的“无奴说”并未彻底推翻包括郭沫若“战国封建论”在内的传统古史分期理论,但其或多或少地影响到改革开放以后中国古代社会形态与古史分期理论讨论的学术走向。改革开放初期学术界对郭沫若“战国封建论”的辩难,也屡屡暴露出理论上的公式主义和史料运用上的实用主义等突出问题,辩论双方多有偏激武断之处,这在一定程度上影响到学术评判的客观与公正。
In the initial stage of reform and opening up, under the framework of the theory of the staging of traditional ancient history, “Feudalism in the Western Zhou Dynasty”, “The Unification of Feudalism in the Qin Dynasty” and “Feudalism in the Wei and Jin Dynasties” Put forward new questions, discussed and criticized, while scholars from the Warring States Period on Feudalism replied to various defenses from the above factions and at the same time, they also added and revised Guo Moruo’s theory of feudalism in the Warring States. The above arguments play a certain role of expansion and deepening of the research on the ancient Chinese social form and the staging of ancient history in the new era. In the early stage of reform and opening up, “no slavery theory” did not completely overthrow the traditional theory of ancient history, including Guo Moruo’s “feudal theory of Warring States.” However, it more or less affected the ancient Chinese society after the reform and opening up Academic Trends in the Discussion of the Theory of Stages of Ancient History. In the early stage of reform and opening up, the academic circles’ debates over Guo Moruo’s theory of feudalism in the Warring States Period also frequently exposed such prominent problems as theoretical formalism and pragmatism in the application of historical data. Both sides of the debate were often over-arrogant and arbitrary. To a certain extent, Impact on the objective and fair academic judgments.