论文部分内容阅读
本文比较了直立堤上立波各理论解的波浪压力计算值,并引用一些试验数据验证其符合程度。计算表明,森弗罗公式与其它各理论解及实验值的差别较大,而欧拉坐标的一次近似解却能包络大多数实测数据而不至于偏差过大。与合田法对比其相对值大体相当,绝对值则小于10～30%.苏联新规范的立波公式与我规范值相比则小10～35%.因而以欧拉坐标一次近似解作为立波压力公式是适宜的。
In this paper, the calculated values of the wave pressures of the theoretical solutions of the upright embankment are compared, and some experimental data are used to verify their compliance. The calculation shows that the difference between the Senfro formula and other theoretical solutions and experimental values is large, whereas an approximate solution of Euler coordinates can cover most of the measured data without undue deviation. Compared with the Hetian method, its relative value is roughly equivalent, and its absolute value is less than 10-30%. The formula of the new wave in the Soviet Union is 10-35% smaller than that of our standard, so an approximate solution of the Euler’s coordinate is used as the law of standing wave pressure Is suitable.