论文部分内容阅读
一个学生曾经说过这样一件事:“俺老师是一个很利索的人,课堂效率很高,一节课能讲完四五张卷子。”当眼前有一部分试卷时,真的很羡慕这样的人,干脆、利落、快刀斩乱麻。这样在处理习题数量上,显然占有一定的优势,但背后的问题,却值得思考与研究。试卷讲评,讲什么?怎样讲?谁来讲?评什么?怎样评?评价结果发挥什么样的功能?针对这些问题,我认为试卷讲评应做到以下几点。一、试卷讲评应根植于问题第一,试卷讲评前教师要研究试卷中的问题和性质,清楚学生的问题出现在哪里?哪些是多数错误中的
A student once said something like this: “My teacher is a very neat person, the class is very efficient, and I can finish four or five exams in a lesson.” "It really envies me when there are some papers in front of me Such people, simply, neat, cut the Gordian knot. In this way, it is obvious that there are certain advantages in handling the number of exercises, but the problems behind it are worth considering and studying. How to evaluate? What kind of evaluation? Evaluation of the results to play what kind of function? For these problems, I think papers should comment on the following points. First, the papers comment should be rooted in the first problem, the papers before the teacher comment on the question and the nature of the paper to identify the students where the problem appears and what is the most error