近几年来我省中考作文试行“分项划等”的评分方法。去年国家教委考试中心推出了《高考作文评分通用量表》,这样做无疑已经或将要产生良好的效应——评分有所遵循。但说实在的,评卷人员在操作过程中或因记不清各个条目,或因经验主义作祟,往往不自觉地将“标准”束之高阁。这也难怪,尽管指定标准的人们把文章构成的18种因素类聚为3—4项(“内容、结构、语言”,外加 In recent years, our province senior high school entrance essay pilot “sub-plan” and other scoring methods. Last year, the State Education Commission Examination Center introduced the “General Scale of College Entrance Examination Grading”, which has undoubtedly had or will have a good effect - the scores have to be followed. But to be honest, appraisers often unconsciously put the “Standards” in the process of operation because they can not remember all the items or because they are experiencing empiricism. It’s no wonder, though, that people who designate standards gather together 18 of the 18 categories of articles into 3-4 items (“content, structure, language”