论文部分内容阅读
在法庭辩论中,不管对方准备得怎样充分,怎样能言善辩,都难免在辩词中露出破绽。因而论辩的一方只要善于捕捉对方的破绽,同时又善于揭露和利用破绽,就会夺取辩论的胜利。故本文特谈谈法庭辩论捕捉破绽妁方法。 一、分析对方的辩词是否合符法律规范。毫无疑义,凡法庭辩论都必须遵循一定的法律规范。运用法律规范或者证明自己观点的正确性,或者说明对方观点的错误性。任何一方的辩词如果违反了法律规范,那么其观点就失去了支撑的力量而不能成立。因此论辩的一方只要善于分析对方辩词中违背法律规范的破绽并能紧紧地抓住这一破绽展开攻势,就可使对方束手就擒。例如被告人王某某(治安联防人员)、张某某(警校教师)于1988年6月至7月间,携带瞥棍、印泥、治安登记表,
In the courtroom debate, no matter how well prepared and how eloquently the other party is prepared, it is unavoidable to make a flaw in the defense. Therefore, as long as one side of the argument is good at catching each other’s flaws, but also good at exposing and exploiting the flaws, it will win the debate victory. Therefore, this article specifically talk about the court debate to capture flaws method. First, analyze each other’s defense is in line with legal norms. No doubt, all court debates must follow certain legal norms. Use legal norms or prove the correctness of your point of view, or explain the other party’s point of view of the error. If any party’s argument violates the legal norms, then its point of view loses the power of support and can not be established. Therefore, if one side of the argument is good at analyzing the flaws that violate laws and regulations in the other party’s defense and can seize this flaw closely, it can make the other party get away with it. For example, the defendant Wang Moumou (public security and anti-personnel), Zhang Moumou (police school teacher) in June 1988 to July, carrying a grizzly stick, ink, security register,