“事实胜于雄辩。”用典型而有代表性的事实论据阐明观点是议论文常见的方法。初中第四册短文两篇《说“勤”》和《事业篇》堪称精用事实论据的典范。稍作比较可发现两文的论述结构较为相近——都围绕中心论点并列了两个分论点,而四个分论点中有三个分论点(“勤出成果”“勤出智慧”“事业是人生不朽的丰碑”)都采用了同一种论据方法——选用多个事例来阐明观点。它们“选例有代表”,“叙例有详略”,“排例有顺序”,“析例善概括”,集中体现了运用“事实论据”的技巧和方法。教学中以此为重点,有层次、有章法地训练,让学生在“比 “Facts speak louder than words.” Using typical and representative factual arguments to clarify the point of view is a common method of argumentation. The two essays in junior high school’s fourth volume, “Say Diligence” and “Career”, can be regarded as exemplary models of factual arguments. A little comparison shows that the discourse structures of the two articles are more similar—all of them are centered around the central argument and are divided into two sub-arguments, and there are three sub-arguments in the four sub-arguments (“diligence results” “diligent wisdom” “business is life”. The monumental monuments“ all use the same argument method - use multiple examples to clarify the point of view. They are ”selective examples are representative“, ”Syria examples are described in detail“, ”orders are listed in order“, and ”analysis of examples are good at summarizing“, embodying the techniques and methods of using ”factual arguments". In this teaching, the focus is to have a structured and structured training that allows students to