论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析和评价对年轻人工流产妇女开展两种不同流产后计划生育服务干预的效果。方法:抽取90例自愿流产、自愿参加本调查并且年龄≤25岁的年轻人工流产妇女,随机分为未干预组、基本干预组、优质干预组,每组30例。结果:流产后基本干预组和优质干预组的避孕知识得分、性生活采取避孕措施率、正确使用避孕套率明显高于未干预组,有显著性差异(p<0.05),且优质干预组高于基本干预组。流产后基本干预组和优质干预组的非意愿再次妊娠率低于未干预组,有显著性差异(p<0.05),且优质干预组低于基本干预组,有显著性差异(p<0.05)。结论:对年轻人工流产妇女采取计划生育服务干预能提高生殖健康水平,优质服务干预更加有效。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and evaluate the effects of two different types of interventions in family planning services on abortion after young abortion. Methods: Ninety young abortion women who voluntarily participated in the survey and who were under 25 years of age were randomly assigned to non-intervention group, basic intervention group and high-quality intervention group, 30 cases in each group. Results: The contraceptive knowledge scores of the basic intervention group and the high-quality intervention group after abortion, contraceptive rate of sexual life, the correct use of condoms rate was significantly higher than the non-intervention group (p <0.05), and high-quality intervention group In the basic intervention group. There was a significant difference (p <0.05) between the unintended re-pregnancy rate of abortion group and the quality intervention group (p <0.05), and the difference between the quality intervention group and the basic intervention group was significant (p <0.05) . Conclusion: The intervention of family planning services for young abortion women can improve the reproductive health level, and the intervention of quality service is more effective.