在哲学的语用学转向和非形式逻辑对话与论辩理论等理论的影响下,法律推理研究历经了一个由语形和语义研究到语用研究的转向。在具有强烈对话或论辩色彩的法律实践特别是司法实践中,法律推理研究的这种语用转向,为司法实践中之法律推理提供了新的分析评价视角,也为理性司法提供了更为恰当的逻辑理性根基。 Under the influence of philosophical pragmatics and non-formal logical dialogues and argument theories, legal reasoning has undergone a shift from the study of form and semantics to the study of pragmatics. In the legal practice with intense dialogue or argumentation color, especially in judicial practice, the pragmatic shift of legal reasoning research provides a new perspective of analysis and appraisal of legal reasoning in judicial practice and also provides more appropriate The logical rationale.