论文部分内容阅读
对篇名或关键词含有生态补偿的CSSCI论文进行考查后发现,从2000年到2013年的14年间,中国生态补偿法学研究除篇均引证数明显多于环境科学和经济学外,在学科期刊总刊文量、平均刊文量、单刊刊文量、总引证数、单刊引证数上均处劣势。同时,法学者所著论文在产出模式上存在一定程度的自我重复;在论文引证上存在引证不规范,以及忽视甚至忽略外文参考文献的问题。这些情况反映了对生态补偿的法学研究在整体上尚待提高。
After examining the dissertations of CSSCI with the title or keyword of ecological compensation, it is found that in the 14 years from 2000 to 2013, except the articles cited in the study of ecological compensation law in China were significantly more than those in environmental science and economics, The amount of publication, the average amount of publication, the amount of a single publication, the total number of citation, citation on the number of single is inferior. At the same time, there is a certain degree of self-repetition in the output mode of theses by law scholars; there are some problems in the cited papers, such as non-standard quotations and neglect or even neglect of foreign references. These situations reflect the legal research on ecological compensation as a whole to be improved.