论文部分内容阅读
我国羁押审查制度变迁历程遵循着“固守格局”“科层内控”“增量配设”和“边缘调整”四种改革逻辑。对公安侦查案件的逮捕审查,公检法系统采取“固守格局”逻辑;对自侦案件的逮捕审查,检察机关坚持检察审查原则,改采“上提一级”方案,遵循着“科层内控”的进路;对于2012年《刑事诉讼法》增设的捕后羁押审查制度,由于强制措施变更主体仍由公检法三机关分段共享,检察院捕后复审之后只能建议其他机关改变羁押,该制度属于“增量配设”模式,仅仅是一种意义有限的“边缘调整”。在这些改革策略下,刑事司法机关能动性机制得以维系,而权利话语则艰难地实践。未来司法改革仍有赖于更多元化的立法决策主体的平等参与和理性互动。
The changing course of detention review system in our country follows the four reforming logic of “sticking to the pattern”, “internal controlling”, “increasing allocation” and “marginal adjustment”. Procuratorial organs adhere to the principle of procuratorial review, and switch to adopt “put up a” plan, follow the “ Bureau of internal control ”approach; 2012 the“ Criminal Procedure Law, ”the new post-arrest detention review system, as the main changes in coercive measures still by the public security organs three sections to share, prosecutors arrested after the review can only be proposed to other organs change Custody, the system is “incremental allocation ” model, only a limited meaning “edge adjustment ”. Under these reform strategies, the criminal justice mechanism’s motivation mechanism is maintained, while the rights discourse is hard to implement. The future judicial reform still depends on the equal participation and rational interaction of more diversified legislative decision-making bodies.