论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出(一)案情简介案例1:原告赵某某诉张某某抚育费纠纷案被告张某某与原告的母亲赵某于1995年同居,原告赵某某2003年8月出生后随母亲生活。赵某与被告两次分手时,于2001年9月12日、2004年2月25日分别达成协议。双方的后一协议涉及子女生育问题,且被告在后一协议中表示,“再付壹万元作为二人之间纠纷及乙方(即赵某)怀孕生子所有问题的了结……”。被告履行了两次协议约定的给付义务35000元。诉讼中,被告否认与原告之间存在任何亲子关系。原告申请就其与被告张某某之间的血缘关系进行亲子鉴定,但被告拒绝;而赵某没有提供原告赵某某的出生证及户籍证明。
Case 1: Introduction to the Case Case 1: Plaintiff Zhao Moumou v. Zhang Moumou Suspense Fee Dispute Zhang Moumou and the plaintiff’s mother, Zhao, lived together in 1995 and the plaintiff Zhao Moumou was born in August 2003 Living with mother. Zhao and defendants broke up twice, on September 12, 2001, February 25, 2004 reached an agreement. The latter agreement involved the issue of children’s procreation. In the latter agreement, the defendant said that “a further 10,000 yuan will be paid as a result of the dispute between the two parties and the conclusion of all the problems of Party B (ie Zhao) pregnant ...”. The defendant fulfilled the 35000 yuan obligation of payment stipulated in the two agreements. In the lawsuit, the defendant denied having any paternity with the plaintiff. The plaintiff applied for a paternity test on the blood relationship between him and the defendant Zhang Moumou, but the defendant refused and Zhao did not provide the birth certificate and residence certificate of the plaintiff Zhao Moumou.