论文部分内容阅读
目的阻断娱乐场所经性途径传播艾滋病性病,提高娱乐场所高危人群预防艾滋病性病意识和能力,探索可持续发展的艾滋病性病干预模式,降低全区艾滋病的发病率。方法以不记名方式,让娱乐场所服务人员开展艾滋病健康教育、检测艾滋病抗体、促进安全套使用和鼓励接受性病诊疗与生殖健康服务等干预措施,在干预前后进行2次问卷调查,对干预效果评价。结果目标人群艾滋病基本知识知晓率干预前为73.28%,干预后为82.23%,干预前后差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);最近一次商业性行为使用安全套的比例由干预前53.68%上升到干预后92.23%(P<0.05);最近一个月商业性行为每次都使用安全套的比例由干预前47.55%上升到干预后88.72%(P<0.05)。干预前后该目标人群均未检出HIV阳性;目标人群梅毒阳性率干预前为6.86%,干预后为3.51%,干预前后差异有统计学意义(x2=4.60,P<0.05)。结论在花都区娱乐场所通过开展高危行为干预,能有效提高服务人员艾滋病知识知晓率和行为正确率,干预效果明显。
Objectives To block sexually transmitted diseases of sexually transmitted diseases in entertainment venues, improve the awareness and ability of HIV / AIDS prevention in at-risk groups in entertainment venues, explore a sustainable AIDS intervention mode, and reduce the incidence of AIDS in the whole region. Methods By way of anonymity, entertainment service personnel should conduct AIDS health education, detect AIDS antibody, promote the use of condoms and encourage the reception of STDs and reproductive health services. Two questionnaires were conducted before and after the intervention to evaluate the intervention effect. Results The awareness rate of basic knowledge about AIDS in the target population was 73.28% before intervention and 82.23% after intervention. The difference between before and after intervention was statistically significant (P <0.05); the proportion of condom use in recent commercial practice rose from 53.68% before intervention to intervention (P <0.05). The proportion of commercial use of condoms in every commercial activity increased from 47.55% before intervention to 88.72% after intervention (P <0.05). Before and after the intervention, no HIV positive was found in the target population. The positive rate of syphilis in the target population was 6.86% before intervention and 3.51% after intervention. The difference was statistically significant before and after the intervention (x2 = 4.60, P <0.05). Conclusion High-risk behavioral interventions in entertainment venues in Huadu District can effectively improve AIDS awareness and correct behavior of service personnel, and the intervention effect is obvious.