不言而喻,宋代史家既同历史上其他王朝的封建史家本质相同,又同宋代其他文人知识分子和官僚士大夫别无二致,其本身不可避免地存在着阶级的和历史的局限性。但是,我们“判断历史的功绩,不是根据历史活动家没有提供现代所要求的东西,而是根据他们比他们的前辈提供了新的东西。”检诸历史,宋代史家在反对天命思想方面,的确是“比他们的前辈提供了新的东西”,值得我们注意,应该好好总结。 It goes without saying that both the historians of the Song Dynasty and the feudal historians of other dynasties in history were essentially the same in character as other intellectuals and bureaucrats and officials of the Song Dynasty who, inevitably, had class and historical limitations. However, we “judge the achievements of history not on the basis that the activists of history did not provide what modernity requires, but on the basis of them providing something newer than their predecessors.” Examining history, indeed, the historians of Song Dynasty opposed the idea of ​​fate Is “something newer than their predecessors” deserves our attention and should be well summarized.