论文部分内容阅读
采用质性研究的方法,探讨伦敦奥运会国内外优秀田径运动员竞赛成败归因倾向.以新浪、腾讯网田径板块对伦敦奥运会的报道、访谈为主要资料,通过质性分析软件Nvivo8.0,运用扎根理论原理,分析出国内外优秀运动员归因方式及其存在的主要差异.表现在:在成功情景中,国内和国外运动员在内外源和可控性维度上存在差异性,且国外运动员更趋向于合理的归因倾向,在稳定性维度上只有国外男子运动员趋向于合理归因.在失败情境中,国内外男子运动员只有在可控性维度上存在差异性,国外男子运动员更趋向于合理归因,但国内男子运动员的归因倾向有其一定的道理;国内外女子运动员在内外源和可控性维度上存在差异,国外女子运动员的归因倾向更合理,在稳定性维度上都倾向于合理归因.
This paper uses the method of qualitative research to explore the attribution of the success or failure of the London Olympic Games track and field athletes at home and abroad.With Sina, Tencent track and field coverage of the London Olympic Games reports, interviews as the main data, through qualitative analysis software Nvivo8.0, Theory and principle, and analyze the main differences between at home and abroad elite athletes attribution and its existence.Expressed in: In the success scenario, domestic and foreign athletes in the external and controllable dimensions are different, and foreign athletes tend to be more reasonable , Only male athletes in foreign countries tend to be reasonably attribution in the dimension of stability.In the unsuccessful situations, the male athletes at home and abroad only have discrepancy in the controllability dimension, and foreign male athletes tend to reasonably attribution, However, the attribution tendency of domestic men’s athletes has its own reasons. There are differences between domestic and foreign women athletes in terms of both internal and external sources and controllability. Attributions of foreign women athletes are more reasonable and tend to be reasonable in the stability dimension because.