学术规范、学术对话与平等宽容的研究是中国人文社科界特有的现象。对这种现象进行学术探讨是走向 2 1世纪的中国社科研究规范化、本土化、全球化的基本前提条件。学术对话通常包括学术争论和学术评论。前者是以追求真理为核心在某一领域的学术创新活动 ,后者主要指学术著述发表前后的两种评论制度。在客观公正的学术成果发表的稿件遴选制度建立之前 ,对已发表的科研成果进行公开的平等宽容的学术评论的意义至关重要。学术研究的平等的精神除体现在遵守学术研究规范化的方法和方法论上 ,还要求学者在观念上摒弃“人微言轻”的偏见 ,不搞学术政治不做学术商人 ;学术研究中的宽容是以其平等精神为要旨的 ,它要求学者在观念上抛弃“文人相轻”的陋习 ,既有宽待和善待他人过错的度量 ,又有能容得下他人成就的胸襟 Academic norms, academic dialogue and equal and tolerant research are peculiar to Chinese humanities and social sciences. Academic research on this phenomenon is the basic prerequisite for the standardization, localization and globalization of Chinese social sciences going to the 21st century. Academic dialogues often include academic debates and academic commentary. The former is based on the pursuit of truth as the core of academic innovation activities in a particular field, the latter mainly refers to the academic commentaries before and after the publication of two kinds of comment system. Before the manuscript selection system for the publication of objective and fair academic achievements is established, it is of crucial importance to conduct openly equal and tolerant academic commentary on published scientific achievements. In addition to the spirit of equality of academic research embodied in the methodological and methodology of academic research standardization, but also requires scholars to abandon the concept of “people say slightly prejudice”, do not engage in academic politics academic businessman; academic research tolerance is based on its equality It requires the scholars to abandon the bad habits of “the literati and the minor” on the concept, not only the measure of treating others well and the fault of others, but also the mind capable of carrying others’ achievements