论文部分内容阅读
关于被告人李华的行为如何定性,主要存在三种不同意见:第一种意见认为,李华构成受贿罪。理由是:1.李华收受张挺20万元后向赵钧提出请托要求,在被赵钧拒绝后,经张挺追要却拒不退还该款,并将绝大部分款项归为己用,其非法占有该款的故意明显。李华系国家工作人员,利用自己与赵钧的密切关系,通过赵的职务行为为请托人谋取不正当利益,其行为符合刑法第三百八十八条的规定,构成斡旋型的受贿罪。2.“两高”2007年《关于办理受贿刑
There are mainly three different opinions on how to determine the behavior of the defendant, Li Hua: The first opinion is that Li Hua constituted a crime of accepting bribes. The reasons are: 1. Li Hua received 200,000 yuan after Zhang Jun Zhao asked to request, after being rejected by Zhao Jun, Zhang Ting chase but refused to refuse the money, and most of the money classified as own use , The intentional possession of the paragraph illegally obvious. Li Hua, a national staff member, used his close relationship with Zhao Jun to seek improper benefits for trustees through Zhao’s job performance. His behavior was in line with the stipulation of Article 388 of the Criminal Law and constituted a good-faith bribery offense. 2. “two high ” 2007 "on the acceptance of bribes