论文部分内容阅读
南宋魏庆之的《诗人玉屑》用辑录体的形式,编刊了历代尤其是两宋诸家论诗衡文的短札谈片,堪称辑录体诗话的集大成之作。该书所引文献,上迄汉魏,下至唐宋,遍及总集、别集、诗话、类书、笔记,颇为芜杂。正由于《玉屑》具有辑录体的性质,故导致了作者在编辑选录时,以及文本在刊刻流传的过程中,不可避免地产生了一系列讹误。纵观全书,大体可归结为以下三方面:1.由版本众多而引起的文字错漏;2.误录诗名、人名,甚至是诗人与诗句之间出现张冠李戴的现象;3.征引原始文献时未加考辨,故多有漏注或误注出处者。凡此种种,尚有待全面的校勘与笺证。笔者拟将各本《玉屑》与其原始出处进行对校,确定文字的优劣,对书中原有的讹夺逐一进行考辨,以笺释出所引条目的真实出处。
Southern Song Wei Qingzhi “poet jade pieces” in the form of recorded volume, the compilation of the history of the two Song dynasties, especially poetic short article on the paper, called a verse of poetry collection masterpiece. The literature cited in the book, from the Han Dynasty Wei, down to the Tang and Song Dynasties, throughout the episode, do not set, poetry, class books, notes, quite miscellaneous. Due to the nature of the jade pieces, jade scraps inevitably lead to a series of errors that the author inevitably produces when editing and selecting records, as well as circulating the text. Throughout the book, can be generally attributed to the following three aspects: 1. The version caused by numerous errors and omissions; 2. Misrecognized poem, name, or even between the poet and the poem; No test, so there are many missed or mistaken note the source. All this, yet to be a comprehensive proofing and proof. I intend to each of the “jade crumbs” and its original source for school, to determine the pros and cons of the text, the original book to verify the original one by one, with a note to explain the true source cited.