听一位在基层工作的负责人说,他最近参加上级会议,已签订了十多份责任书,涉及内容包罗万象。笔者愕然。为执行上级决策,完成本单位的年度目标任务,签个责任书,以体现直接责任人履行职责,这本无可厚非。但是,凡事不分主次都签责任书,往往弊多利少,难以奏效。首先,容易出现“装门面”现象。责任书签了,责任也就“下放”了,即使出现纰漏,“板子”打不到领导的“屁股”上,这实际是一种不负责任的推诿。其次,容 Hear a person in charge of grassroots work, said that he recently attended the parent meeting, has signed more than a dozen letters of responsibility, covering all-encompassing content. I was stunned. For the implementation of superior decision-making, the completion of the unit’s annual goals and tasks, signed a letter of responsibility to reflect the direct responsible person to perform their duties, this is understandable. However, all matters regardless of primary and secondary signed letters of responsibility, often more harm than good, it is difficult to work. First of all, prone to “installed facade ” phenomenon. Responsibility bookmarks, the responsibility also “decentralization ”, even if there is flaws, “board ” can not hit the leadership “ass ”, this is actually an irresponsible push. Second, capacity