论文部分内容阅读
商标平行进口在各国一直都存在的不小的争议,无论在美国还是欧盟都经历过或者正在经历着各种价值的选择。我国现行立法没有对商标的平行进口作出任何规制,导致在我国司法实践中有多处同案不同判的情况。最高院公报维多利亚的秘密一案对商标平行进口做出了新价值选择,该选择实质上是美国“实质性差别原则”1的适用,而该种价值选择也是最符合当下中国国情的选择。
The parallel importation of trademarks has always existed in many countries, no small controversy, whether in the United States or the EU have experienced or are experiencing a variety of value options. The current legislation in our country does not make any regulation on the parallel importation of trademarks, which leads to the fact that there are many cases of different decisions in the judicial practice in our country. The Supreme Court Communique Victoria’s Secret Case made a new choice of value for the parallel importation of trademarks. This choice is essentially the application of the United States principle of substantive differences, 1 which is also the most appropriate choice for the current situation in China .