论文部分内容阅读
道光时期,由于控告官吏勒折浮收等不法行为的京控案被作为“咨交之案”处理,因而地方官事实上成为最后的裁决者,这就使得事关民众根本利益的控告难以得到公正审理,当原告大多成为被惩治的对象,法律的天平更多向权力一方倾斜时,累积的官民二元社会问题也就有了全面撕裂之虞。本案的主角叶墉从告发书吏开始,走向开设客店,雇请讼师,包揽南汇县京控,并隐然建立从案源、作词,到伴护、投递全过程,覆盖省城至京城间的讼师活动网络。而作为劣迹累累、无数次京控中被告的南汇县漕书朱超宗,尽管短时间受到惩罚,但旋即回复原职(役),继续鱼肉民众。而叶墉的后继者们,仍然在一开始就知道结局的京师之路奔走,毕竟,到皇帝那里评理是他们最后的希望。
During the Daoguang period, since the Beijing-controlled case that accused officials of levying charges and levies and other unlawful acts was handled as the “case of consultative submission,” the local officials actually became the final arbiter, which resulted in the accusation of the fundamental interests of the masses Difficult to get fair trial, when most of the plaintiffs become punished objects, the legal balance more inclined to one side of power, the cumulative dual problem of government and civil society will have a full tear. The protagonist of the case started from the announcement of clerks Yeh, to open a guest house, hired a lawyer, embrace Nanhui County, Beijing control, and implicitly established from the source, lyricist, escort, delivery process, covering provincial capital to Beijing between the lawsuit Activity Network. As a misdeed and numerous countless defendants in Beijing accused Zhu Chaozhong of Caojing County in Nanhui County, despite being punished shortly, immediately returned to his original position (serving) and continued to fish people. And Yeh’s successors, who still knew the ending of the capitalist road at the outset, run to the emperor after all, judging them as their last hope.