论文部分内容阅读
司法公正对于一个法治国家的重要意义 ,一直是我们讨论的热点问题 ,但何为司法公正?如何评判司法公正?却少人问津。公正本身属于历史的范畴 ,不同历史时期、不同意识形态、不同阶级或群体、不同文化传统、不同学派甚至于不同的个人对公正都有不同的理解与认识。为了从不同方面、不同角度加强对司法公正的研究 ,从本期开始 ,我们新设一个法官、学者、律师等谈司法公正的栏目。敬请广大作者赐稿。如何评判司法活动的公正与否 ,的确是一个很难的问题。四川省高级人民法院副院长文敬以一个法官的敏锐 ,在剖析现行司法制度及司法观念的基础上 ,对这个问题进行了深入的探讨。
The importance of judicial impartiality for a country governed by the rule of law has always been a hot issue for our discussion. However, what is judicial justice? How to judge judicial fairness? Justice itself belongs to the category of history. Different historical periods, different ideologies, different classes or groups, different cultural traditions, different schools and even different individuals have different understandings of justice. In order to strengthen the study of judicial impartiality from different aspects and from different perspectives, from the beginning of this issue, we have set up a new section of judges and scholars, lawyers and others on justice. Please write the majority of authors. How to judge the impartiality of judicial activities is indeed a very difficult issue. Wen Jing, vice president of the Higher People’s Court of Sichuan Province, conducted an in-depth discussion on this issue based on the sensitivity of a judge and on the basis of analyzing the current judicial system and judicial concepts.