在批判道德实在论和道德相对主义的基础上,罗尔斯提出了道德建构主义的方法。道德建构主义的方法认为正义原则是道德主体在原初状态的程序下建构的结果。与道德实在论相对,道德建构主义主张正义原则的建构特点;与道德相对主义相对,道德建构主义主张正义原则的客观性。罗尔斯对于道德建构主体的设定具有高度同质化的特点,对于道德客观性的论述也存在一定的不足。 On the basis of criticizing moral realism and moral relativism, Rawls proposed the method of moral constructivism. The moral constructivist method holds that the principle of justice is the result of the construction of the moral subject under the original state procedure. In contrast to moral realism, moral constructivism advocates the construction of the principle of justice; as opposed to moral relativism, moral constructivism claims the objectivity of the principle of justice. Rawls has a high degree of homogeneity for the setting of the subject of moral construction, and there are some shortcomings in the argument of moral objectivity.