论文部分内容阅读
警察在不受监督情况下面临压力做出的决策本身涉及自由裁量权的行使,并且在考虑警察行为的合法性时依然会受到质疑。执法机构设法控制自由裁量权,以避免警察自由裁量权的不良后果并保持机构合法性。本研究使用期望方法和基于价值的方法,探讨土耳其巡警在做出反应时外在动机、内在价值取向和选择性执法态度的作用。研究结果表明,代表外在动机认知的奖励期望与反应之间在统计上并不存在显著关系。然而,代表受访者内在动机的公共服务动机在统计上与反应之间有强烈的正相关关系。巡警对于选择性执法的态度对其反应情况有消极影响。对实践工作者的启示一些研究强调偶然性激励对于控制自由裁量权的作用,与此不同,本研究从实证上表明内在奖励对警察行为有更为强烈的影响。领导者在引领下属为公众利益和社会福祉而工作方面的作用至关重要。设计不好的外在奖励制度可能会挤出员工的内在动机并降低与工作有关的成果。在等级组织中尤为如此,因为这里奖励政策更可能被认为是不公平的。
The decisions that police face under pressure without supervision inherently involve the exercise of discretion and can still be challenged when considering the legality of police conduct. Law enforcement agencies have sought to control discretion in order to avoid the adverse consequences of police discretion and to maintain the legitimacy of the institution. This study uses expectation methods and value-based approaches to explore the role of externalities, intrinsic value orientation and selective law enforcement attitudes in response to Turkish patrols. The results show that there is no statistically significant correlation between reward expectations and responses that represent external motivation. However, the motivation for public service that represents the intrinsic motivation of the respondents is strongly and positively correlated with the response. Patrol attitudes toward selective enforcement have a negative effect on their response. Implications for Practicing Workers In contrast to some studies highlighting the role of contingent incentives in controlling discretion, this study empirically demonstrates that intrinsic rewards have a more pronounced effect on police behavior. The role of leaders in leading their subordinates to work for the public interest and social well-being is of crucial importance. Poorly designed external reward systems can crowd out employees’ intrinsic motivation and reduce work-related outcomes. This is especially true in hierarchical organizations, where incentives are more likely to be considered unfair.