论文部分内容阅读
目的了解大庆地区口腔医生比色的现状。方法于2009年12月至2010年10月采用分层随机抽样调查的方法对大庆地区23个综合医院和口腔诊所进行问卷调查,共调查口腔医生170名。将被调查的医生按照工作年限、学历及所在医院规模分组,对各组医生目测比色时是否首先选择亮度、是否采用柔和自然光、是否要求患者卸妆进行比较。结果使用VITA比色板进行比色的162名中比色时首先选择亮度的,在不同工作年限和不同医院规模的各组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中工作年限<3年和所在医院规模>10张牙椅的口腔医生在各自分组内比例最高。在比色时光源的选择上,不同学历和不同医院规模的各组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中研究生学历和医院规模>10张牙椅的口腔医生在各自分组内采用柔和自然光的比例最高。在比色时是否要求患者卸妆的统计中,各组之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论大庆地区口腔医生的目测比色缺乏一致性。
Objective To understand the current situation of colorimetry in dentists in Daqing area. Methods From December 2009 to October 2010, stratified random sampling method was used to survey 23 general hospitals and dental clinics in Daqing area, and 170 oral stomatologists were investigated. The doctors to be investigated were grouped according to their working years, education levels and the hospital scale. The doctors first selected the brightness, whether the natural light was used softly or not, and whether the patients were required to make makeup remover for comparison. Results The first choice of brightness when using colorimetric VITA colorimetric panel for 162 colorimetric was statistically significant (P <0.05) among groups with different length of service and different hospital size (P <0.05), of which the working life was less than 3 The number of dentists who had 10 or more dental chairs in their hospital year and year was the highest among their respective groups. In the time of colorimetric light source selection, there were significant differences among different groups with different academic qualifications and different hospital sizes (P <0.05). Among them, the oral doctors with postgraduate qualifications and hospital size> 10 dental chairs adopted in their respective groups The highest proportion of soft natural light. There was no significant difference between the groups in the statistics of whether to require remover for patients in colorimetry (P> 0.05). Conclusion There is a lack of consistency in visual colorimetry in dentists in Daqing area.