这个问题很有趣但也很难回答。手艺或技艺本来是艺术的基础,古代艺术世界中艺术品多数是以无名方式存在,生产艺术的人通常在名义和实际上都不拥有艺术品,艺术品的实际拥有者是艺术的订件人或赞助者。现在观念主义以哲学方式颠倒了这种所有制关系。部分艺术家以“观念”享有了原来由皇帝、教宗、赞助人拥有的对艺术品的所有权,而使他们获得这种权力的实际上是资本制度,所以,我觉得这类艺术家不应该再拥有 This question is very interesting but difficult to answer. Art or art was originally the foundation of art. Most art works in the ancient art world exist in anonymous ways. People who produce art often do not own artwork in name and in fact, and the actual owner of artwork is the art of the subscribers Or sponsor. Now conceptualism reverses this system of ownership in a philosophical way. Some artists, with “idea ”, enjoyed the ownership of works of art originally owned by the emperor, the pope, and the patron. What made them gain such power was actually the capital system. Therefore, I think such artists should not Have it again