论文部分内容阅读
目的通过分析我国空军招飞定选中疝疾病谱,对比中美招飞医学选拔标准,为完善我军招飞医学选拔体系提供参考。方法回顾性地分析空军医学选拔中心近4年招飞定选受检者疝病数据并将其适用于美军招飞标准进行再分析,对比中美招飞医学选拔标准差异。结果 2012~2015年共检出40名疝病者,淘汰29人(4人食管裂孔疝,3人脐疝,22人腹股沟疝);疝病淘汰人数占外科总淘汰人数4.70%,2012~2015年每年疝病占外科淘汰人数比例较为固定(P=0.1539);腹股沟疝、脐疝、食管裂孔疝的中美医学选拔实证研究显示中美疝病医学标准存在明显差异。结论中美招飞医学选拔疝病标准存在差异,美军招飞医学标准重视功能。修改目前疝病医学选拔标准有利于保障我国空军战斗力。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the selection of hernia disease in China’s Air Force and to compare the standard of medical selection between China and the United States in order to provide reference for improving the medical selection system of our military. Methods A retrospective analysis of air force medical selection centers in the past 4 years recruiting selected subjects hernia data and apply it to the US military recruit standards for reanalysis, compared with the difference between the two standards. Results A total of 40 hernias were detected in 2012-2015, 29 were eliminated (4 hernia of esophageal hiatus, 3 hernia of umbilical and 22 herniated inguinal hernia). The herniation eliminated accounted for 4.70% of the total number of surgical surgeries. From 2012 to 2015, Hernia accounted for the proportion of surgical phase out of a relatively fixed number (P = 0.1539); inguinal hernia, umbilical hernia, esophageal hiatus of Chinese medicine selection empirical study shows that there are significant differences between the medical standards of the United States and hernia. Conclusions There are differences in the standard of hernia selection between China and the United States. The medical standards of the U.S. military move to fly and focus on function. Amendments to the current hernia medical selection criteria help to protect our air force combat effectiveness.