论文部分内容阅读
宏观经济管理从直接控制向间接控制的转化,是形成社会主义有计划商品经济新体制的必然要求。间接控制与直接控制的根本区别在于,国家不再干预企业的具体经营活动,而是通过加强需求控制,在保证国民经济总量平衡的前提下,利用市场,采用经济手段引导企业的生产投资方向,从而既能保证总量平衡,又能促进结构合理;既有利于保持宏观经济的稳定,又能充分发挥企业的活力。所以,从理论上说,间接控制要优越于直接控制。但是,理论上理想的控制模式,不等于现实中能够顺利有效运行的模式,这里的关键是是否具备一系
The transformation of macroeconomic management from direct control to indirect control is an inevitable requirement for the formation of a new system of planned socialist commodity economy. The fundamental difference between indirect control and direct control is that the state does not intervene in the specific business activities of enterprises, but instead strengthens demand control, and on the premise of ensuring the balance of national economic aggregates, it uses the market and adopts economic means to guide the direction of production and investment of enterprises. Therefore, it can not only guarantee the balance of the total amount, but also promote the rationality of the structure; it will not only help maintain the macroeconomic stability, but also give full play to the vitality of the enterprise. Therefore, in theory, indirect control is superior to direct control. However, the ideal control mode in theory is not equal to the mode that can run smoothly and effectively in reality. The key here is whether there is a system.