论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法对滥用职权罪没有明确规定其罪过形式,导致学界对滥用职权罪的主观罪过产生了多种分歧认识。本文从判定滥用职权罪的罪过应以行为人对危害结果所持心理态度为标准入手,分析了滥用职权罪具有故意和过失的认识因素,具有间接故意和过于自信过失的意志因素,而不具有直接故意的意志因素和疏忽大意的认识意志因素,从而得出滥用职权罪只能有间接故意与过于自信过失的复合主观罪过的结论。
Our country criminal law did not stipulate clearly to its crime the crime of abuse of power, which caused the academic circle to have a variety of disagreements on the subjective sin of abusing power. This article starts with the crime of judging the crime of abuse of power and starts with the psychological attitude of the perpetrator to the result of the harm. It analyzes the knowing factors of intentional and negligent crimes and the will factors of indirect intentional and overconfident negligence without directly Intentional intentional factors and negligent knowing intentional factors, which leads to the conclusion that there can be only a composite subjective sin of indirect intention and overconfidence and negligence.