论文部分内容阅读
党的十一届三中全会后,尤其是治理整顿以来,加强了物质文明和精神文明的建设,各方面出现了许多新的起色,文风也有了很大的改善,实事求是的精神得到了进一步的发扬,这是很值得庆幸的。然而,遗憾的是学术界仍然有少数人受不良的影响较深,在文风上存在着较严重的问题,如研究态度上不踏实,撰著作风上不严肃,总想走捷径、讨便宜,不要付出艰苦劳动的代价,就可轻易地获得名利双收。这种害己误人的学风,理应得到人们应有的重视。近期笔者阅读了《农业考古》1989年第1期的有关文章,感触就很深。如关传友、马西苓两位先生致该刊主编的信中指出“邢湘臣《国树——银杏树》一文,谬误甚多”,“张冠李
Since the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Party, especially since the reorganization and rectification, the building of material and spiritual civilization has been strengthened. Many new improvements have taken place in various fields and the style of writing has also been greatly improved. The spirit of seeking truth from facts has been further Carry forward this is very fortunate. However, it is regrettable that there are still a few academics who are deeply affected by bad influences. There are serious problems in the style of writing. For example, they are not practical in their research attitude, they are not serious in their work style, and they always want to take shortcuts and seek cheapness. Pay the price of hard work, you can easily get fame and fortune. Such a style of learning that harms others and misses people deserves due attention from people. Recently I read the “Agricultural Archeology” in 1989 the first issue of the article, the feeling is very deep. Such as Guan Chuan-You, Ma Xeling two letters to the editor-in-chief pointed out that “Xing Xiangchen” State Tree - Ginkgo Tree, “a lot of fallacies,” "Zhang Guanghui