笔者曾看见几位教师,都以修辞格定义为根据,为了一句话的修辞格争论不休。 请看这句话:“竹叶烧了,还有竹枝;竹枝断了,还有竹鞭;竹鞭砍了,还有深埋在地下的竹根。” 一方说这是典型的顶真修辞格例句,另一方则认为这句话综合运用了排比兼顶真修辞手法。双方争论激烈,各执一词。 一、持“顶真兼排比”之说者的理 The author once saw several teachers, all based on the rhetorical definition, and argued for rhetoric in one sentence. Look at this sentence: “Bamboo leaves are burned, there are bamboo branches; bamboo branches are broken, there are bamboo whips; bamboo whip cut, there are bamboo roots buried deep underground.” One side said that this is a typical top rhetoric On the other hand, the other side believes that this sentence uses a combination of double-headed and true rhetorical devices. The two sides argued fiercely and insisted on each other. First, the rationale for the speaker who holds the “true and true ratio”