本研究是使用社会剖析法围绕Y市水灾个案而展开的一项实证研究,旨在检验在危机管理中城市的社会政治“器官”功能,并分析社会政治环境如何导致了水灾中的社会问题。研究表明,包括社会生产的隔离(城镇化建设中的弱势群体、空间与脆弱性)、公共水利工程管理的政府管理思维(项目制)、动员与参与两种政治沟通方式的逻辑差异、以及新闻报道的符号建构等系列因素都很难在常态下察觉,却又处处影响着城市有效公共治理,最终产生严重社会问题。 This study is an empirical study using social analysis method to investigate floods in Y City. The purpose of this study is to examine the social and political “organ” function of cities in crisis management and to analyze how socio-political environment leads to social problem. The research shows that there are logical differences between social management including social production isolation (vulnerable groups in urbanization, space and vulnerability), government management thinking (project management) of public water conservancy project management, mobilization and participation in two forms of political communication, and news Reported symbolic construction and other series of factors are difficult to detect under normal conditions, but everywhere affect the effective public governance in the city, and ultimately have serious social problems.