论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗不孕症的临床疗效。方法:选取2012年7月-2013年12月收治的80例不孕症患者根据术式分为观察组43例(单孔腹腔镜)及对照组37例(传统腹腔镜)两组,观察比较两组患者的临床效果。结果:观察组美容效果优于对照组,两组患者手术时间、出血量、排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症及妊娠率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单孔腹腔镜及传统腹腔镜治疗不孕症均具有显著效果,但单孔腹腔镜美容效果优于传统腹腔镜。
Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of single-hole laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopy in the treatment of infertility. Methods: Totally 80 infertile patients admitted from July 2012 to December 2013 were divided into observation group (43 cases) and control group (37 cases) (traditional laparoscopy group) Clinical effect of two groups of patients. Results: The cosmetic effect in the observation group was better than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in operative time, bleeding volume, exhaust time, hospital stay, postoperative complications and pregnancy rate between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Single hole laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopic treatment of infertility have a significant effect, but the single hole laparoscopic cosmetic effect is better than the traditional laparoscopy.