一、“符象化”的两种定义已经有不少学者尝试定义“符象化”这一术语及其修辞的美学的和社会文化的功能和效果。为本文的讨论起见,我将借鉴两种广义的界定——它们在某些方面有所重叠,同时在其他方面存在分歧。两种界定都将“符象化”视为一种出现于约公元前4至2世纪之间的修辞手法或修辞现象,但关于“符象化”的题材及其意在对听者及读者造成的影响,两种界定在看法上非常不同。首先,在20世纪的最后几十年间存在一种被艺术史和文 First, the “definition” of the two definitions There have been many scholars try to define the “symbol” of the rhetoric of the terminology and the aesthetic and social and cultural functions and effects. For the purpose of my discussion of this article, I will draw on two broad definitions - they overlap in some ways, while others are divisive. Both definitions regard “symbolicization” as a rhetorical or rhetorical phenomenon that occurs between the 4th and 2nd centuries BC, but the subject matter of “figurative” and its implication Listeners and readers, the two definitions are very different. First of all, in the last few decades of the twentieth century there was a history of art and writing