补叙这种本应独立的叙述方法,在现行的写作教材中,有的将其归入插叙;有的虽然承认其独立地位,但对它的界说则是含混的。如“补叙是在叙述过程中对情况或事物作某些解释或说明”。那么到底对什么“情况”、什么“事物”,又是作的哪些“解释或说明”呢?还是不明白。鉴于此,笔者认为应该弄清补叙与插叙的区别。本文拟从结构形式、所表达的内容及作用等三个方面论及补叙与插叙的区别。 Supplementing this narrative method that should have been independent, in the current writing materials, some of them are classified as interjections; while some acknowledge their independent status, their definition is ambiguous. For example, “supplementing is to explain or explain things or things in the narrative process.” Then, in the end, what “interpretation or explanation” of “conditions” and “things” is still not understood? In view of this, the author believes that it is necessary to clarify the difference between supplementation and insertion. This article intends to discuss the differences between recharging and inserting from the three aspects: structural form, expressed content, and role.