论文部分内容阅读
笔者以案例为切入点,指出一般保证期间和保证合同诉讼时效的衔接是一个争议比较大的问题。并从传统理论、《民法通则》规定、目前学界的主要观点和司法实践中的观点出发,简要分析各家学说的得失利弊,先破后立,最后得出自己的观点。笔者粗浅地认为,原则上一般保证合同的诉讼时效应该从对债务人的财产执行不能之日起开始计算,在例外情况之下从债权人向保证人主张保证责任之日开始起算。
The author takes the case as an entry point, and points out that the connection between the general guarantee period and the limitation of the contractual action of guarantee contract is a controversial issue. And from the traditional theory, “General Principles of Civil Law” provisions, the current academic view of the main point of view and judicial practice point of view, a brief analysis of the pros and cons of each doctrine pros and cons, the first break, the final draw their own point of view. The author argues, in principle, that in general the statute of limitations for the duration of a contract should be calculated from the date on which the debtor’s property can not be enforced, starting from the date on which the creditor claims the guarantor’s liability under exceptional circumstances.