论文部分内容阅读
本文所论限于国际法中国家对国家的赔偿 ,不包括民间赔偿。二战后日本对有关各受害国在战争赔偿问题上持不同的立场 ,对战争的最大受害国中国的立场是设法逃避赔偿的责任 ,对亚洲其他国家的立场则是虽无赎罪意识 ,但能承认有赔偿责任。日本在战争赔偿问题上对亚洲国家采取不同的立场既与各受害国的对日政策有关 ,也与战后的国际形势有关 ,此外它也是日本错误的战争史观的一种表现。
This article is limited to the compensation of countries in international law for the country, excluding civil compensation. After World War II, Japan took a different position on the issue of compensation for war by the victimized countries. China’s position as the country most victimized by the war is its responsibility to seek to evade compensation. The position of other countries in Asia is not declared atonic but recognized There is a liability. Japan’s different positions on Asian countries in respect of war reparations relate not only to the policy of Japan for the victimized countries but also to the post-war international situation. In addition, it is also a manifestation of Japan’s erroneous view of war history.