论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨大学新生应对方式特点。方法:采用应对方式问卷对563名大学新生进行测量。结果:大学新生以使用成熟的应对方式(解决问题、求助)为主;在幻想因子上,性别和专业的主效应显著,女生得分比男生高,文科学生得分高于理科学生得分;在自责因子上,专业主效应显著,文科学生得分高于艺术体育类学生;在求助因子上,生源地的主效应显著,城市大学新生得分高于农村学生。结论:大学新生更多地使用成熟的应对方式;女生比男生更多地使用幻想的应对方式;文科学生比艺术体育类学生更多地使用自责的应对方式;文科学生比理科生更多地使用幻想的应对方式;农村学生比城市学生更少使用求助的应对方式。
Objective: To explore the characteristics of freshmen coping styles. Methods: 563 college freshmen were measured using coping style questionnaire. Results: The freshmen used mature coping styles (solving problems and asking for help). In the fantasy factor, the main effect of gender and majors was significant. Female students scored higher than boys, liberal arts students scored higher than science students, In terms of factors, the main effect of major is significant, and liberal arts students score higher than arts and sports students. In seeking help factor, the main effect of students’ origin is significant, and freshmen in urban university score higher than rural students. Conclusions: Freshmen use more mature coping styles; girls use more fantasy coping styles than boys; liberal arts students use more self-blaming coping styles than art sports students; and liberal arts students use more Use fantasy coping styles; rural students use less coping styles than urban students.