方舟子遇袭案,一审二审法院都认定五名被告人构成寻衅滋事罪,不构成故意伤害罪,这是实务界长期坚持“唯后果论”的结果,长期为理论界所诟病。在司法实践中,应该坚持主客观相统一及罪刑法定的原则,绝不可以臆造一些法律之外的原则,违背我国的法制理念。 Fang’s case of attack, the first instance court of second instance finds five defendants constitute a crime of provocation, does not constitute a crime of intentional assault, which is the practice of long-term adherence to “the only consequences ” results, long criticized for theorists. In judicial practice, we should adhere to the principle of the unification of subjectivity and objectivity and the legal punishment for crimes and punishments, and must never create some principles other than laws and violate our legal concept.