论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,我国档案学研究空前活跃,硕果累累,呈现出一派繁荣景象。但从总体上看,档案学研究还处于前科学研究阶段,停留在应用科学的水平上,尚未形成合理的体系框架。现阶段各种版本的档案学专著,几乎如出一辙地以档案管理为标准模式作为研究对象,外部现象描述多,内部规律揭示少,尤其是从构思学科体系结构方面进行的探讨更少,许多问题缺乏概括综合和应有的理论高度。人们习惯将档案学的知识来源——档案管理工作等同于档案学学科对象,这是档案学研究裹足不前的障碍,也是目前档案学研究仍处于经验层次的重要原因。科学是理论的认识,科学高于经验的认识。完整的科学体系是由理论科学和应用科学两大门类构成。目前我国档
In recent years, archival science in our country has been unprecedentedly active and fruitful, presenting a prosperous scene. However, on the whole, the research of archival science is still in the stage of pre-scientific research, and stays at the level of applied science. However, a reasonable system framework has not yet been formed. At the present stage, various editions of archival monographs, almost exactly the same file management as the standard model as the research object, describe many external phenomena, reveal less internal rules, especially from the concept of academic architecture to explore less, lack of many problems Summarize the comprehensive and due theoretical height. People are accustomed to the source of knowledge of archives - archives management is equivalent to the subject of archival science, which is an obstacle to the archival study is not enough, but also the current archival science is still an important reason for the level of experience. Science is the theory of understanding, science is higher than the experience of understanding. The complete scientific system is composed of two major categories: theoretical science and applied science. Currently my file